USCC Home
 
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Join Today
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
USCC Home Small Business Center Issues and Advocacy Media Center Chambers Associations Members

nav
AmCham Directory
Asia
Europe and Eurasia
Middle East and Africa
Policy
Trade Primer
Traderoots
Western Hemisphere
Join
navbottom

Related
About the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Careers
Events Calendar
FAQs
Programs
Publications
related_Bottom

Related
 
 
 
 
 
related_Bottom

 
New International > Policy

Antiboycott Issues

Background

During the mid-1970s the United States adopted two laws that seek to counteract the participation of U.S. citizens in other nation's economic boycotts or embargoes. These "antiboycott" laws are the 1977 amendments to the Export Administration Act and the Ribicoff Amendment to the 1976 Tax Reform Act. Boycotts of Israel in some Arab nations -- although less stringent today than in past years -- are the principal foreign economic boycotts that U.S. companies must be concerned with today. The antiboycott laws, however, apply to all boycotts imposed by foreign countries that are unsanctioned by the United States.

It is currently a federal criminal offense under U.S. "antiboycott laws" for any U.S. person to participate in another nation's boycotts or embargoes of third countries. The definition of "boycott" is expansive and includes such seemingly benign activity as furnishing information about the nationality of past or present business partners to an inquiring government. The penalties imposed for each "knowing" violation can be a fine of up to $50,000 or five times the value of the exports involved, whichever is greater, and imprisonment of up to five years. Under certain circumstances, the criminal penalties for each "willful" violation can be a fine of up to $50,000 and imprisonment for up to 10 years.

U.S. Chamber Position

We do not countenance boycotts in any form and international standards for combating such boycotts must be developed. Meanwhile, in the absence of such international agreement, and at a bare minimum the standard for determining whether criminal activity has occurred must be clarified and made consistent with international norms.

 
Related
 
 
sp_takeaction.gif
 
See Related Content
xml.gif RSS Issue Feed

 
 
Join | Login | Search | Sitemap | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
 
Copyright © 2008 U.S. Chamber of Commerce 1615 H St NW Washington DC 20062-2000 All Rights Reserved
Advancing human progress through an economic, political and social system based on individual freedom, incentive, initiative, opportunity, and responsibility.