New International > Policy
Free Trade Agreements
Since presidential Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) was restored in 2002 the United States has embarked on an unprecedented effort to open foreign markets to U.S. exports by expanding its network of free trade agreements (FTAs) with Israel and the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) from the 1980's and 1990's.
The U.S. Congress has approved free trade agreements with the following countries:
Implemented
September 1, 1985...............................................Israel
January 1, 1989.....................................................Canada (C-USFTA)
January 1, 1994.....................................................Mexico (NAFTA, with Canada joining)
December 17, 2001..............................................Jordan
January 1, 2004.....................................................Chile
January 1, 2004.....................................................Singapore
January 1, 2005.....................................................Australia
January 1, 2006.....................................................Morocco
March 1, 2006........................................................El Salvador
April 1, 2006...........................................................Nicaragua
April 1, 2006...........................................................Honduras
July 1, 2006............................................................Guatemala
August 1, 2006......................................................Bahrain
March 1, 2007........................................................Dominican Republic
Pending Implementation
Costa Rica (has yet to ratify the agreement)
Oman
Peru
Pending Congressional Approval (with date negotiations were concluded)
Colombia (Feb. 27, 2006 – agreement signed)
Panama (Dec. 19, 2006 – agreement signed)
Republic of Korea (April 1, 2007 – agreement signed)
FTAs benefit U.S. businesses, workers, and consumers in significant ways. These agreements do much more to open foreign markets to U.S. exporters and investors than vice versa, because the U.S. marketplace is already one of the most open in the world. With the European Union joining East Asian and Latin American countries in negotiating dozens of FTAs, U.S. firms run the risk of being placed at a competitive disadvantage unless the United States moves forward aggressively with its own FTAs.
Nonetheless, it is critical that FTAs meet certain criteria if they are to maximize their potential for business opportunities, economic growth, and new jobs.
- First, FTAs must be comprehensive, with all goods and services placed on the negotiating table, including sensitive products. Seeking exclusions for particular commodities from the beginning can undermine the commercial value of an FTA.
- Second, FTAs must be ambitious, with market-opening disciplines on services, investment, and intellectual property that go far beyond the relatively modest commitments made in the context of the World Trade Organization.
Colombia Trade with Canada and US - Agreements Impact
Colombia Trade with Canada and US - Workers Impact
FTAs Turbo Charging US-Exports (PDF)
Chamber Calls for More Trade; Not More Reports (PDF)
|