USCC Home
 
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Join Today
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
USCC Home Small Business Center Issues and Advocacy Media Center Chambers Associations Members

nav
Accomplishments
Chamber Testimony
Grassroots Alerts
Index of Issues
Letters to Congress
Members of Congress
Policy Priorities
Regulatory Comments
State Resources
Litigation Center
Join
navbottom

Related
About the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Careers
Events Calendar
FAQs
Programs
Publications
related_Bottom

Related
 
 
 
 
 
related_Bottom

 
Issues Center > Index of Issues > Government Contracting

Procurement/Government Contracting

Background

The U.S. Chamber has a long-standing policy that the government should not produce goods and services for itself or others if acceptable privately owned and operated services are or can be made available for such purposes. The government saves billions of dollars when it partners with and invests in private sector companies. This in turn helps sustain our nation’s competitive edge in industries such as defense, information technology, and management. Despite these benefits, the government continues to perform countless commercial services, even though business has repeatedly proved that it can provide these services at a lower price, with higher quality and a faster delivery schedule. The Chamber formed the Privatization and Procurement Council in October 2001 to promote and protect private sector involvement in the federal market and to maximize business prospects.

The federal government procures more than $250 billion annually, which amounts to tremendous opportunities for the private sector. In the post-9/11 world, the government is increasingly relying on the private sector to provide products and services to protect our homeland. Government must continue to streamline the acquisition process, ensure a fair and open procurement system, and rely more on the private sector for the goods and services it needs. Federal procurement requirements often create regulatory inflexibility and impose costly administrative burdens on industry with little value to taxpayers. The federal government must undertake more reforms that reduce government restrictions, eliminate government monopolies, and promote a level playing field for all interested firms.

U.S. Chamber Position

The Chamber will continue to work to increase business opportunities and profitability for the private sector in the federal market by advocating a fair and efficient contracting process and limits on unfair government competition. The Chamber will also support streamlining the policies and procedures that govern outsourcing decisions and transferring more of the government’s commercial activities to the private sector. Among the Chamber’s priorities are ensuring that no government entity has special status in the procurement process and advocating comprehensive, governmentwide Federal Prison Industries reform legislation.

Staff Contact Information

Economic Policy
(202) 463-5620

 
Related
 
Circular A-76 (Issues)
 
Government Contracting (Priorities)
 
 

Letter to the House Armed Services Committee on FY05 National Defense Authorization Act -- May 19, 2004

Letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee on FY05 National Defense Authorization Act -- May 18, 2004

Letter to the Office of Management and Budget on FY 04 Transportation Treasury Appropriations -- Nov 19, 2003

Letter to the House of Representatives on FY 04 Transportation, Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act -- Nov 5, 2003

Letter to the Senate on FY 04 Transportation, Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act -- Nov 5, 2003

Key Vote Letter to the House of Representatives on the FY 04 Interior Appropriations Bill -- Jul 16, 2003

Letter to Senate Conferees of the FY03 Omnibus Appropriations bill -- Jan 21, 2003

Letter to the Senate on FY03 Omnibus Appropriations Bill -- Jan 9, 2003 

Letter to the House in Opposition to Amendments to the Fiscal Year 2003 Treasury Postal Appropriations Bill -- Jul 16, 2002

Letter to the Senate in Support of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2003
(S 2514) -- Jun 17, 2002

Letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman in Support of the National Defense Authorization Act FY2003 -- Jun 17, 2002

Letter to the Senate in Opposition to the Kennedy "Equal Competition in Contracting" Amendment -- Jun 17, 2002

Letter to House Defense Committee Chairman Stump on FY03 Defense Bill -- May 3, 2002

Letter to House on Anti-Contracting Amendment -- Apr 30, 2002

sp_takeaction.gif
 
See Related Content
xml.gif RSS Issue Feed

 
 
Join | Login | Search | Sitemap | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
 
Copyright © 2008 U.S. Chamber of Commerce 1615 H St NW Washington DC 20062-2000 All Rights Reserved
Advancing human progress through an economic, political and social system based on individual freedom, incentive, initiative, opportunity, and responsibility.