Multi-Industry Letter Re FDA Food Safety to Committee on Health, Labor and Pensions
The Honorable Tom Harkin
Chair, Committee on Health, Labor and Pensions
U.S. Senate
Washington, DC 20510
The Honorable Michael B. Enzi
Ranking Member, Committee on Health, Labor and Pensions
U.S. Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Chairman Harkin and Ranking Member Enzi:
Thank you for your leadership in ensuring that funding federal food safety activities is one of Congress’s highest priorities. The below signed organizations are committed to making sure America’s food supply is the safest in the world. We urge you to continue to appropriately fund the food safety activities of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rather than support the imposition of any new food regulatory taxes on consumers and food makers.
As you know, the recently released 2013 budget plan for FDA includes a proposal to impose a food facility registration fee to fund agency activities required by the recently passed Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). The agency projects it will collect $220 million in fiscal year (FY) 2013 from food producers, makers and distributors if authorized by Congress.
FDA’s 2012 budget proposal also targeted raising revenue from new fees starting in 2013 to assist FDA implement FSMA. Congress rejected that proposal. Congress also considered and rejected such food facility registration fees during congressional consideration of the FSMA, which was signed into law on January 4, 2011.
The food industry has worked diligently with FDA in the past year to implement FSMA. We applauded the increase Congress gave FDA of approximately $40 million in FY 2012 to support FSMA implementation. As you know, over the past 5 years, FDA has been one of the few discretionary federal agencies to receive funding increases through the annual appropriations process. If FDA requires additional funds to support FSMA implementation, the agency could have included such a request in its FY 2013 budget proposal, rather than seeking authorization of new regulatory taxes, which Congress has twice previously rejected.
We stand ready to work with Congress and the administration to find a better and less burdensome solution. A number of our organizations sent the attached letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and the Office of Management and Budget Director Jeffrey Zients before the 2013 budget was released urging the administration request adequate congressional funding for FDA food safety activities and expressing our opposition to additional regulatory taxes.
Imposing new fees on food facilities would represent a food safety tax on consumers. As food companies and consumers continue to cope with a period of prolonged economic turbulence, the creation of a new food tax would mean higher costs for food makers and higher food prices for our consumers.
We urge Congress to appropriately fund FDA’s food safety responsibilities and to reaffirm its stated opposition to imposing new regulatory taxes on food producers and consumers.
If you have questions about our concerns, please contact any of the signatory organizations. Thank you again for your leadership.
Sincerely,
American Bakers Association
American Council of Independent Laboratories
American Feed Industry Association
American Frozen Food Institute
American Fruit and Vegetables Processors and Growers Coalition
American Meat Institute
Association of Food Industries
California League of Food Processors
Cheese Importers Association of America
Frozen Potato Products Institute
Global Cold Chain Alliance
Independent Bakers Association
International Association of Refrigerated Warehouses
International Bottled Water Association
International Dairy Foods Association
Juice Products Association
Midwest Food Processors Association
National Association of Margarine Manufacturers
National Chicken Council
National Confectioners Association
National Fisheries Institute
National Frozen Pizza Institute
National Grain and Feed Association
National Meat Association
National Pasta Association
National Turkey Federation
North American Millers’ Association
Northwest Food Processors Association
Pet Food Institute
Produce Marketing Association
Refrigerated Foods Association
Shelf-Stable Food Processors Association
Snack Food Association
United Egg Producers
United Fresh Produce Association
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
USA Rice Federation
Western Growers Association
Related Links
- Two Comments Requesting Extension of 30-day Comment Period of Two FDA Proposed Rules
- U.S. Chamber President Looks Toward an Improving Economy, Promotes Plan to Spur Job Creation
- Multi-industry Letter on Executive Order 13536 and the Food Safety Modernization Act
- Letter on Amendments Offered by Senator Mike Johanns and Senator Max Baucus to S. 510
- Letter Opposing an amendment to the "Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act"
- Letter Opposing an Amendment to the "Water Resources Development Act"
- Letter on Reauthorizing the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) and the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act (MDUFMA)
- Letter on Amendment to "Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act"



