Key Vote Letter Supporting the Shaheen/Toomey/Kirk Amendment #925 to the Farm Bill
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE:
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the world’s largest business federation representing the interests of more than three million members and organizations of every size, sector, and region, as well as state and local chambers and industry associations, and dedicated to promoting, protecting, and defending America’s free enterprise system, strongly supports the Shaheen/Toomey/Kirk Amendment #925 to the 2013 Farm Bill, which would bring several needed reforms to the U.S. sugar program, a chronically flawed policy that creates and maintains an artificial gap between U.S. and world sugar prices.
While the sugar program is often described as a “no-net cost” program, it in fact imposes major costs. Artificially high sugar prices cost consumers as much as an additional $3.5 billion a year, and create an undue burden on manufacturers in the sugar-using sector, which employs over 600,000 workers in the United States. The U.S. Department of Commerce estimates that for every one sugar-growing job protected, three manufacturing jobs are lost. In spite of this, the Farm Bill as it is currently drafted would continue the U.S. sugar program unchanged.
This amendment would not end the sugar program, but would provide far-reaching and pragmatic reforms. In the 2008 Farm Bill, Congress exacerbated an already invasive program by, among other things, increasing price supports, imposing new restrictions on imports, and introducing the Feedstock Flexibility Program, in which the federal government must purchase surplus sugar and sell it at a loss to ethanol plants. This amendment would remove those damaging add-ons. Moreover, it would establish market-oriented components to help spur job creation and ease the program’s burden on manufacturers.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce strongly supports the Shaheen/Toomey/Kirk Amendment #925. The Chamber strongly urges you to vote in favor of Amendment #925, and may consider including votes on, or in relation to, the Amendment in our annual How They Voted scorecard.
Sincerely,
R. Bruce Josten
Related Links
- Two Comments Requesting Extension of 30-day Comment Period of Two FDA Proposed Rules
- U.S. Chamber President Looks Toward an Improving Economy, Promotes Plan to Spur Job Creation
- Multi-industry Letter on Executive Order 13536 and the Food Safety Modernization Act
- Letter on Amendments Offered by Senator Mike Johanns and Senator Max Baucus to S. 510
- Letter Opposing an amendment to the "Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act"
- Letter Opposing an Amendment to the "Water Resources Development Act"
- Letter on Reauthorizing the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) and the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act (MDUFMA)
- Letter on Amendment to "Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act"



