USCC Home
 
U.S. Chamber of Commerce Join Today
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
USCC Home Small Business Center Issues and Advocacy Media Center Chambers Associations Members

nav
Business & Society
Capital Markets
Institute for a Competitive Workforce
Institute Program
Let's Rebuild America Initiative
Litigation Center
About NCLC
Case List
Join
-News & Events
National Chamber Foundation
Regulatory Cooperation
Research and Analysis
Workforce Freedom Initiative
Join
navbottom

Related
About the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Careers
Events Calendar
FAQs
Publications
related_Bottom

Related
 
 
 
 
 
related_Bottom

 
Programs > Litigation Center > News & Events > Business Alerts

September 2, 2004

NCLC Files Suit Against New Mutual Fund Rules
Charges SEC Overstepped Authority in Independent Boards

 View the complaint 

The National Chamber Litigation Center (NCLC) - the public policy legal arm of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States - filed suit today on behalf of the Chamber, seeking to overturn a Securities and Exchange Commission's rule requiring mutual fund boards of directors to have an independent chair and that 75 percent of the directors be independent as well.

"The SEC has over-reached its authority, resulting in a rule that is bad for investors and contrary to the intent of Congress," said NCLC's Executive Vice President Stephen A. Bokat.

Congress specifically permitted mutual fund advisers to play a significant role in governing fund investments, mandating in the Investment Company Act that only 40 percent of directors be independent, according to the Chamber's filing.  The SEC's rule far exceeds these Congressional requirements.

Furthermore, the SEC rule eliminates an investor's right to invest in funds whose leadership is affiliated with an established adviser. 

"Mutual fund investors often select funds based on the reputation of the adviser who they expect will provide leadership for the fund," said Bokat.  "The SEC has unlawfully eliminated a valid investment decision." 

The SEC failed to satisfy basic rulemaking requirements by not giving serious consideration to public comments during the rulemaking; ignoring important information about the costs - and the consequences - of the rule; and failing to consider evidence that an independent chair is likely to harm rather than help fund performance.

 


 
 
Join | Login | Search | Sitemap | Contact Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
 
Copyright © 2008 U.S. Chamber of Commerce 1615 H St NW Washington DC 20062-2000 All Rights Reserved
Advancing human progress through an economic, political and social system based on individual freedom, incentive, initiative, opportunity, and responsibility.