From shipping to staffing, the Chamber and its partners have the tools to save your business money and the solutions to help you run it more efficiently. Join the U.S. Chamber of Commerce today to start saving.
If you thought the media’s “fact checking” phenomenon was inane when one operation “investigated” whether Wisconsin’s Governor Scott Walker could buy a sweater for $1, we have Michelle Ye Hee Lee at The Washington Post’s Fact Checker declaring this U.S. Chamber tweet on the Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im) “irresponsible," even though she doesn't question any facts.
It’s a Twitter quiz, a fun way to educate the public about this issue. Lee is bothered that it states that Ex-Im hasn’t cost the taxpayers a penny. In fact, it has generated $7 billion in surpluses for taxpayers over the last two decades.
Lee doesn’t question the facts--that would be impossible to do since they come from Ex-Im’s annual report which conforms to current federal law.
Instead, Lee went after the medium in which these facts were presented, writing, “Accurately simplifying this esoteric topic to four clicks on a tweet is just not possible.”
Agreed. No one at the Chamber claims the Ex-Im Bank’s importance to jobs and the economy can be boiled down to a tweet. Thus we’ve published blog posts, small business testimonials, videos [ here, here, here, and here], slide shows, and yes, lots of social media content. All these pieces together tell the story of why Congress should pass a long-term reauthorization of the Ex-Im Bank.
We’re not sure why the Chamber got hit for using the numbers required by law.
Lee isn’t willing to choose between accounting methods, but Ex-Im doesn't have that luxury. It must report its accounts the way it does. What’s more, as Lee reports, “the Government Accountability Office found it ‘reasonable’ for the Export-Import Bank to report that it had sent more money to the Treasury than it was appropriated.”
Wouldn't reporting results using a method other than the one legally required be irresponsible?
What's "irresponsible" is pulling one tweet out of thin air.
Sometimes a tweet is just a tweet.