Jump to navigation

Trans-Pacific Partnership

Monday, September 12, 2016 - 10:30am
 
As U.S. companies scour the globe for consumers, the booming Asia-Pacific region stands out. According to a report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the global middle class will expand from 1.8 billion in 2009 to 3.2 billion by 2020 and 4.9 billion by 2030. Most of this growth is in Asia: In fact, Asia’s middle-class consumers will represent 66% of the global middle-class population and 59% of middle-class consumption by 2030, doubling these shares since 2009.
 
U.S. workers, farmers, and businesses need access to those lucrative markets if they are to share in this dramatic growth. However, U.S. companies are falling behind in the Asia-Pacific. While U.S. exports to the Asia-Pacific market steadily increased from 2000 to 2010, America’s share of the region’s imports declined by about 43%, according to a report by the think tank Third Way. In fact, excluding China, East Asia purchased a smaller share of U.S. goods exports in 2014 than it did five years earlier, despite a 54% increase in total U.S. merchandise exports in that period.
 
One reason U.S. companies have lost market share in the Asia-Pacific region is that a number of countries maintain steep barriers against U.S. exports. A typical Southeast Asian country imposes tariffs that are five times higher than the U.S. average while its duties on agricultural products often soar into the triple digits. In addition, a web of nontariff and regulatory barriers block market access in many countries.
 
Trade agreements are crafted to overcome these barriers. However, Asia-Pacific nations are clinching preferential trade deals among themselves that threaten to leave the United States on the outside, looking in. 
 
According to the Asia Regional Integration Center of the Asian Development Bank, Asian countries have signed 140 bilateral or regional trade agreements, and 75 more are under negotiation or concluded and awaiting entry into force. Two decades ago, just a handful of such agreements were in effect in the region. Meanwhile, the United States has just 3 trade agreements in Asia (with Australia, Singapore, and South Korea). 
 
This challenge is growing: 16 countries are launching expedited negotiations for a trade deal called the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). It includes Australia, China, India, Japan, Korea, and New Zealand as well as the 10 ASEAN countries—but not the United States. 
 
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is America’s best chance to ensure the United States isn’t stuck on the outside—looking in—as Asia-Pacific nations pursue new trade accords among themselves. Its objective is to achieve a comprehensive, high-standard, and commercially meaningful trade and investment agreement with 11 other Asia-Pacific nations, including Australia, Brunei, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, and Vietnam. It also includes Canada, Mexico, Peru, and Chile, thus offering a chance to integrate existing U.S. trade agreements in the Americas. 
 
The United States announced its intent to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) in September 2008 and formally joined the negotiations in March 2010. In late 2015, the agreement was concluded among 12 countries—Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States, and Vietnam—that produce nearly 40% of global GDP. 
 
The TPP would pay huge dividends for the United States. The agreement would significantly improve U.S. companies’ access to the Asia-Pacific market, which is projected to import nearly $10 trillion worth of goods in 2020, according to Third Way. The U.S. would see its exports increase by $357 billion and its annual real income increase by $131 billion by 2030 under the accord, according to a recent analysis conducted by the nonpartisan Peterson Institute for International Economics.
 
The TPP has the potential to strengthen our nation’s commercial, strategic, and geopolitical ties across one of the fastest-growing and most influential parts of the world. It would be an economic shot in the arm, boosting growth and jobs across the country. And it would send a message to the region and to the world that the United States is not going to sit on the sidelines. We’re going to be in on the action.
 

Chamber Recommendations

  • As nations across the Pacific clinch their own trade agreements that exclude the United States, the TPP represents a vital opportunity to ensure that American exporters have access to the world’s most dynamic economies.
  • The TPP negotiations represent an opportunity to establish strong rules to protect intellectual property, cultivate the digital economy, and combat trade and investment protectionism.