National Letter Opposing the NAV Change to Money Market Fund (MMF) Regulation
The Honorable Timothy F. Geithner
Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20220
The Honorable Mary L. Schapiro
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC 20549-1090
Dear Secretary Geithner and Chairman Schapiro:
The undersigned companies and organizations represent a diverse range of industries that rely on money market mutual funds to support their capital raising and investment needs. American business will lose one of its most important sources of short-term funding if money market funds are forced to abandon their stable per-share value—one of the ideas under consideration by the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). With such a change, the expected flight of investors from these funds will severely impair the ability of companies to raise capital in the U.S. and undermine efforts to strengthen the American economy.
Businesses issue commercial paper to meet short-term financing needs such as funding payroll, replenishing inventories, and financing expansion. Since the mid-1980s, money market funds have been major, reliable buyers of those securities and today purchase over 40 percent of the commercial paper issued by American businesses. Should regulators eliminate these funds’ stable net asset value (NAV) some investors will be forced to walk away due to mandatory investment guidelines that require a stable per share value. Others will take their money elsewhere after the simplicity and convenience of the stable NAV disappears. According to one survey of institutional investors, 55 percent of respondents said they would substantially decrease investment in money funds if regulators mandated a floating NAV.1
There are no immediate substitutes for money market funds in this financing role. Bank lending cannot fill this funding gap unless banks raise substantial new capital. Unregulated private pools might see an opportunity to expand, but encouraging investors to migrate to these vehicles hardly seems consistent with efforts to reduce risk, increase transparency, and ensure greater market stability. Mandating a floating NAV would make short-term financing for American business less efficient and far more costly, ensuring a severe setback for an economy emerging from recession.
We have supported appropriate steps taken by the Department of the Treasury and the SEC to preserve and strengthen this vital source of business financing, but believe this is one proposal that should be rejected outright. We urge your support for policies that promote the use of the stable NAV that has served American investors and businesses so well for decades.
We thank you for your consideration and would be happy to discuss this further with you or the appropriate staff.
cc: The Honorable Kathleen L. Casey, Commissioner, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
The Honorable Elisse B. Walter, Commissioner, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
The Honorable Luis A. Aguilar, Commissioner, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
The Honorable Troy A. Paredes, Commissioner, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Mr. Andrew J. Donohue, Director, Division of Investment Management, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
1 Report of the Money Market Working Group, Investment Company Institute, March 17, 2009, p. 110, available at http://www.ici.org/pdf/ppr_09_mmwg.pdf.
Associations, chambers of commerce and businesses can sign onto this letter using the form below.
Note: Executives who wish to sign their organizations onto the letter must choose the appropriate organization type from the drop-down menu. Your personal contact information will be kept private as we do not sell or share supporter lists.
Please note: All fields are required. Please contact us at email@example.com or 888-732-5228 with questions. Thank you.