State Labor Issues

Recent Activity

ArticleNov 18, 2020 - 8:30am

Court Upholds Michigan’s Annual Dues Notification Requirement

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District upholds Rule 6-7.2 of Michigan's Civil Service Rules

CommentNov 05, 2020 - 2:30pm

Comments to CO Regarding Equal Pay for Equal Work Act Proposed Regulations

Read our letter to the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment Regarding Proposed Regulations Implementing Part 2 of the Equal Pay for Equal Work Act

ArticleOct 28, 2020 - 4:45pm

UI Fraud by the Numbers

The past month has been arduous for Coronavirus related negotiations. Numerous proposals have gone back and forth between Congress and the White House, but the goal of getting a bill done has yet to succeed.

ArticleSep 25, 2020 - 2:00pm
California flag

California Passes New Supplemental Leave Requirement

It’s been a busy legislative year in the Golden State, where lawmakers continue to find ways to make doing business there more complicated.

CommentSep 17, 2020 - 3:30pm

Letter to CA Gov Newsom Urging Veto of CA SB 973

The Honorable Gavin NewsomGovernor, State of California1303 10th Street, Suite 1173Sacramento, CA 95814 Via electronic mail: Veto of Senate Bill 973 Dear Governor Newsom:

ArticleSep 02, 2020 - 10:00am
California Sate Capitol

California’s Classification Calamity Continues

The California legislature passed legislation to address a crisis of its own making, AB 5, a law that has wreaked havoc in the state.

Issue BriefAug 31, 2020 - 2:45pm

A Policy Patchwork: Paid Sick Leave

A summary of paid sick leave laws in the states, including COVID-19 legislation

Issue BriefAug 31, 2020 - 2:45pm

A Policy Patchwork: Paid Family Leave

A summary of paid family leave laws in the states

ArticleAug 21, 2020 - 3:45pm
California flag

California’s Uber-Destructive Debacle

An order by a California appeals court has spared millions of people who use Uber and Lyft in California, at least for now.

CommentAug 04, 2020 - 1:15pm

Letter to NJ Governor Murphy Urging Veto of S2380

The Chamber requests a conditional veto S2380 because of its sweeping nature and potential massive costs for employers.