Forum

U.S. Supreme Court

Case Status

Docket Number

Term

2025 Term

Share

Questions Presented

1. Whether a district court's final judgment as to completely diverse parties must be vacated when an appellate court later determines that it erred by dismissing a non-diverse party at the time of removal.

2. Whether a plaintiff may defeat diversity jurisdiction after removal by amending the complaint to add factual allegations that state a colorable claim against a nondiverse party when the complaint at the time of removal did not state such a claim.

Case Updates

Supreme Court holds that the erroneous, interlocutory dismissal of a non-diverse party before final judgment does not cure the jurisdictional defect created by that party’s participation when the case was removed to federal court, requiring vacatur of the judgment

February 24, 2026

Opinion

U.S. Chamber files coalition amicus brief urging Supreme Court to reject inefficient rule that would require diverse defendants to relitigate claims in state court because a federal district court erroneously dismissed a non-diverse party earlier in the case

July 07, 2025

U.S. Chamber Coalition Amicus Brief

Jaime A. Santos and Rohiniyurie Tashima of Goodwin Procter LLP served as outside counsel.

Case Documents

Search