Forum
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Case Status
Pending
Docket Number
Additional Information
Why We’re Suing HHS and CMS to Challenge Illegal Price Controls U.S. Chamber: Biden Administration Rushes to Implement Drug Price Control Scheme, Failing to Examine the Negative Side Effects for SeniorsCase Updates
U.S. Chamber coalition files combined opposition to government’s motion to dismiss and cross-motion for summary judgment and reply in support of summary judgment in challenge to drug-price-control provisions of Inflation Reduction Act
January 10, 2024
Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Christine M. Carletta, Alexander Kazam, and Gregory A. Ruehlmann of King & Spalding LLP, as well as Tami H. Kirby of Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP, served as outside counsel.
U.S. Chamber moves for summary judgment on all counts in challenge to drug-price-control provisions of Inflation Reduction Act
November 08, 2023
U.S. Chamber coalition files amended complaint
October 13, 2023
District court denies both plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction on due process claim and government’s motion to dismiss in challenge to drug-price-control provisions of Inflation Reduction Act
September 29, 2023
The court also ordered the plaintiffs to file an amended complaint.
U.S. Chamber coalition files reply in support of motion for preliminary injunction on due process claim in challenge to drug-price-control provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act
August 25, 2023
Click here to view the reply brief.
U.S. Chamber coalition files opposition to government’s motion to dismiss complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
August 25, 2023
Click here to view the brief.
U.S. Chamber files coalition motion for preliminary injunction, seeking to halt implementation of the drug-price-control provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act as inconsistent with due process
July 12, 2023
Click here to view the memorandum.
U.S. Chamber files coalition lawsuit challenging drug-price-control provisions of Inflation Reduction Act as unconstitutional on separation-of-powers, due process, Excessive Fines Clause, enumerated powers, and First Amendment grounds
June 09, 2023
Click here to view the complaint filed by the Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce, Ohio Chamber of Commerce, Michigan Chamber of Commerce, and U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Gregory A. Ruehlmann, Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Christine M. Carletta, and Alexander Kazam of King & Spalding LLP, as well as Tami H. Kirby of Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP and the U.S. Chamber’s Litigation Center, served as co-counsel for the U.S. Chamber.
Case Documents
- Complaint -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- Memo ISO Motion for Preliminary Injunction -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- Government's Opposition to PI -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- Reply in Support of Motion for a Preliminiary Injunction -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- Opposition to Motion to Dismiss -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- DOJ Reply iso MTD -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- Opinion and Order -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- Amended Complaint -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- Motion for Summary Judgment -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- Defendants MTD or MSJ -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- Plaintiffs' Brief & Reply iso MSJ -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)
- Defendants' Reply iso MTD and Cross MSJ -- Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra (S.D. Ohio)