U.S. Chamber Litigation Center

The U.S. Chamber Litigation Center fights for business at every level of the U.S. judicial system, on virtually every issue affecting business.

Founded in 1977, the U.S. Chamber Litigation Center fights for business at every level of the U.S. judicial system, on virtually every issue affecting business, including class actions and arbitration, labor and employment, energy and environment, securities and corporate governance, financial regulation, free speech, preemption, government contracts, and criminal law.

We represent the Chamber in lawsuits to challenge unlawful federal, state, and local regulatory actions.  We intervene to defend the government in cases brought by activists to challenge pro-business or deregulatory actions.  We file amicus curiae briefs representing the broad views of the business community in important litigation throughout the country, including in the Supreme Court of the United States.  We help advocates prepare for oral arguments in cases that present important business issues.  We work with the media to help the public understand key decisions and legal principles.

The Litigation Center is staffed by a team of experienced in-house litigators.  Seven have significant government litigation experience at the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Agriculture, Department of State, or the White House.  All have significant private sector litigation experience.  Four clerked for Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court.  The Litigation Center retains the nation’s top lawyers, including former U.S. Solicitors General and other executive branch officers, veterans of the Supreme Court bar, and former state court judges and officials, to serve as outside counsel.

Recent Activity

Press ReleaseSep 16, 2021 - 10:30am

U.S. Chamber Applauds H-1B Visa Ruling

U.S. Chamber of Commerce Vice President of Immigration Policy Jon Baselice released the following statement today on the recent ruling in favor of the plaintiffs in Chamber of Commerce v. DHS over H-1B visa restrictions.

Litigation UpdateAug 26, 2021 - 7:15am

Florida High Court Clarifies That ‘Apex’ Doctrine Applies to Corporate Officers

The Florida Supreme Court ruled regarding the “apex” doctrine, which protects high-ranking corporate officers by seriously limiting the circumstances in which they can be deposed. 

Litigation UpdateAug 19, 2021 - 7:15am

Sixth Circuit Limits Some Fair Labor Standards Act Collective Actions

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals became the first federal appellate court to hold that all plaintiffs—including opt-in plaintiffs—in a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act must establish personal jurisdiction over the defendant.

Litigation UpdateJun 30, 2021 - 3:15pm

TransUnion v. Ramirez: The Death Knell for No-Injury Class Actions?

The Supreme Court’s decision in TransUnion v. Ramirez is one of the most important of the Term for business.  There’s no doubt it dealt a serious blow to abusive, no-injury class actions.  But just how far did it go?  Andrew J. Pincus, Archis A. Parasharami & Daniel Jones of Mayer Brown wrote this excellent blog post to answer that question.

Litigation UpdateJun 29, 2021 - 3:00pm

U.S. Supreme Court Holds Pipeline Builders Can Exercise Eminent Domain over State-Owned Lands, Clearing Way for Important Infrastructure Development

In PennEast Pipeline Co., LLC, v. New Jersey, the U.S. Supreme Court held, 5-4, that once FERC approves a new pipeline, the company building the pipeline may condemn all necessary rights-of-way, including on land owned by state governments. 

Litigation UpdateJun 25, 2021 - 2:45pm

U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Government Appropriation of an Easement on Employer Property Constitutes a per se Physical Taking under the Fifth Amendment

A California regulation permits labor organizations to enter agricultural employers’ private property for unionization drives.  The Supreme Court held, 6-3, that the law appropriates a right to invade the growers’ property and therefore constitutes a per se physical tak[1]ing, in violation of the Takings Clause, because the state did not offer just compensation for the taking.

Litigation UpdateJun 25, 2021 - 1:00am

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Certification of Class Action Where Class Members Lack Concrete Injury

In Transunion v. Ramirez, the U.S. Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, put real teeth into the constitutional requirement that all plaintiffs must have a concrete injury to sue. That will reduce abusive, lawyer-driven class actions against businesses by people who suffered no real injury. 

Litigation UpdateMay 17, 2021 - 2:45pm

U.S. Supreme Court Holds That a Pre-enforcement Challenge to Certain IRS Reporting Requirements Is Not Barred by the Anti-injunction Act, Even Though Violation of Those Requirements May Result in a Tax Penalty

The Supreme Court unanimously held that the Anti-Injunction Act does not bar pre-enforcement challenges to regulatory requirements that are not themselves taxes, but are enforced through tax penalties.  The Anti-Injunction Act narrowly, but powerfully, forbids lawsuits undertaken for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any federal tax. 

Litigation UpdateApr 22, 2021 - 3:30pm

U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Holds that FTC Lacks Authority to Seek Equitable Relief such as Restitution or Disgorgement Under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act

The Supreme Court unanimously held that the Federal Trade Commission cannot recover monetary relief, such as restitution or disgorgement, under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act.

Letters to CongressApr 19, 2021 - 3:30pm

U.S. Chamber Letter to the Senate on the Nomination of Lisa Monaco to be Deputy Attorney General

This Hill letter was sent to the Members of the United States Senate, on the nomination of Lisa Monaco to be Deputy Attorney General of the United States.