Antitrust
The Chamber advocates for antitrust laws that benefit all consumers and businesses and do not target specific companies or industries.

Latest
Our Work
Antitrust laws ensure competition in free and open markets, which is the foundation of any vibrant, diverse, and dynamic economy. Healthy market competition benefits consumers through lower prices, higher quality products and services, more choices, and greater innovation.
Events
- Small BusinessC-Suite to Main Street: Building the Network That Builds Your BusinessThursday, April 1612:00 PM EDT - 12:30 PM EDTVirtualLearn More
- Intellectual PropertyGlobal IP SummitTuesday, April 2111:00 AM EDT - 11:00 AM EDTU.S. Chamber of Commerce, 1615 H St NW, Washington, DC 20062Learn More
- Small BusinessSmall Business Grant Program AwardsWednesday, April 2909:00 AM EDT - 09:00 AM EDTU.S. Chamber of Commerce, 1615 H St NW, Washington, DC 20062Learn More
Latest Content
- The Chamber contributed our views on HM Government’s open consultation on the UK’s competition regime.We asked our panel if recent corporate structure without the need for HSR-reportable filing are of concern to competition enforcement.The Robinson‑Patman Act was enacted in 1936 during the Great Depression to prevent large companies from using discriminatory pricing to undercut smaller competitors.As some policymakers push to revive aggressive enforcement of the Robinson‑Patman Act—a 1936 law that restricts price differences between purchasers—Congress should firmly reject these efforts and instead allow modern, pro‑consumer pricing practices that promote competition and lower prices.The FTC's advice on merger challenges needs to be codified in Congress by enacting the SMARTER ACT.With the Robinson-Patman theories of harm under possible investigation, we investigated what our panel thought of the antitrust issue of price discrimination.With 2026 finally here, we asked our panel of experts about the resolutions they hope to see from the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission.This Hill letter was sent to the Members of the House Judiciary Committee ahead of the upcoming hearing titled, “Anti-American Antitrust: How Foreign Governments Target U.S. Businesses.”Antitrust fines based on global turnover result in disproportionate penalties, as seen in Apple's challenge to fines in India.















