Antitrust Laws: Promoting Competition and Free Markets
Critically important but commonly misunderstood, antitrust laws are meant to promote competition and protect consumers. Here’s everything you need to know.
America's antitrust laws promote competition and benefit consumers.
Antitrust laws ensure competition in a free and open market economy, which is the foundation of any vibrant economy. And healthy competition among sellers in an open marketplace gives consumers the benefits of lower prices, higher quality products and services, more choices, and greater innovation.
The core of U.S. antitrust law was created by three pieces of legislation: the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Antitrust Act. These laws have evolved along with the market, vigilantly guarding against anti-competitive harm that arises from abuse of dominance, bid rigging, price fixing, and customer allocation.
The Prompt: Antitrust Speeches
In light of the increasing focus on "America First antitrust" in recent speeches, we sought to gather insights from our The Prompt contributors on their interpretations and key takeaways.
Learn More
Latest Content
- Our experts weigh in ahead of a Senate Commerce Committee oversight hearing, where FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson and Commissioner Mark Meador are expected to testify.The FTC’s now-dismissed case against PepsiCo underscores why reviving aggressive Robinson-Patman enforcement is misguided: it politicizes antitrust, discourages pro-consumer discounting, and is more likely to raise prices and reduce choice.Our panel commented on proposed legislation in California that subjects individual companies to antitrust liability for engaging in "restraints of trade," regardless of whether they hold any form of market power.The FTC's past approaches to Section 5 authority have continuously failed. A new Chamber paper proposes a different path forward.Renewed enforcement of the Robinson‑Patman Act would raise prices, hurt low‑income consumers, and still fail to help small businesses.The FTC’s proposed MLM earnings claims regulation may miss the mark, imposing unnecessary costs on legitimate businesses while overlooking better solutions to protect consumers and support entrepreneurship.We asked our panel if recent corporate structure without the need for HSR-reportable filing are of concern to competition enforcement.The Robinson‑Patman Act was enacted in 1936 during the Great Depression to prevent large companies from using discriminatory pricing to undercut smaller competitors.The FTC's advice on merger challenges needs to be codified in Congress by enacting the SMARTER ACT.
