Antitrust
The Chamber advocates for antitrust laws that benefit all consumers and businesses and do not target specific companies or industries.
New report
U.S. legislative proposals could undermine U.S. economic and security interests and strengthen foreign rivals without any apparent benefit to U.S. consumers.
Feature story
The Chamber is proposing simple, yet effective, changes to the FTC's recusal process to ensure due process and transparency.
Our Work
Antitrust laws ensure competition in free and open markets, which is the foundation of any vibrant, diverse, and dynamic economy. Healthy market competition benefits consumers through lower prices, higher quality products and services, more choices, and greater innovation.
Events
- Small BusinessCO— Small Business DayWednesday, May 0112:00 PM EDT - 02:00 PM EDTLearn More
- Security and Resilience13th Annual Building Resilience ConferenceWednesday, May 15 - Friday, May 1708:00 AM EDT - 03:00 PM EDTLearn More
- Environment and Sustainability2024 Sustainability and Circular Economy SummitTuesday, June 0408:30 AM EDT - 01:30 PM EDTLearn More
Latest Content
This report outlines approaches Congress should take as it considers changes to the FTC’s monetary toolkit in order to protect consumers and preserve a healthy competitive landscape.
This report cautions against current U.S. legislative proposals that could undermine U.S. economic and security interests and strengthen foreign rivals without any apparent benefit to U.S. consumers and workers.
Antitrust legislation would weaken U.S. technology companies’ ability to compete in the global marketplace and undermine our national security interests, according to a new report from the U.S Chamber of Commerce.
New antitrust legislative proposals would specifically target leading American companies, while doing little to actually protect consumers.
The Chamber submitted comments to the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division as to whether and how to revise the 1995 Bank Merger Competitive Review Guidelines.
This Hill letter was sent to the Members of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, opposing S. 2710, the "Open App Markets Act."
This Hill letter was sent to the Members of the House Committee on the Judiciary, on a hearing entitled, "Reviving Competition, Part 5: Addressing the Effects of Economic Concentration on America’s Food Supply."