U.S. Supreme Court

Case Status


Docket Number


2018 Term


Questions Presented

1. Whether Zauderer’s reduced scrutiny of com-pelled commercial speech applies beyond the need to prevent consumer deception.

2. When Zauderer applies, whether it is sufficient that the compelled speech be: (a) factually accurate—even if controversial and, when read as a whole, po-tentially misleading; and (b) merely reasonably re-lated to any non-“trivial” governmental interest.

Case Updates

Supreme Court issues GVR

June 28, 2018

The Supreme Court granted the cert. petition and vacated and remanded the case for further consideration in light of National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 585 U. S. ____ (2018).

U.S. Chamber urges Supreme Court to take up First Amendment challenge to City of Berkeley’s compelled cell phone warnings

February 07, 2018

Click here to view the amicus brief filed jointly by the U.S. Chamber, Retail Litigation Center, Inc., and Business Roundtable.

Adam G. Unikowsky of Jenner & Block LLP served as co-counsel for the amici.

Case Documents