Skip to content

Antitrust Laws

Critically important but commonly misunderstood, antitrust laws are meant to promote competition and protect consumers. Here’s everything you need to know.

Antitrust Laws

America's antitrust laws protect competition and benefit consumers.

Antitrust laws ensure competition in a free and open market economy, which is the foundation of any vibrant economy. And healthy competition among sellers in an open marketplace gives consumers the benefits of lower prices, higher quality products and services, more choices, and greater innovation.

The core of U.S. antitrust law was created by three pieces of legislation: the Sherman Antitrust Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Antitrust Act. These laws have evolved along with the market, vigilantly guarding against anti-competitive harm that arises from abuse of dominance, bid rigging, price fixing, and customer allocation.

America's Antitrust Laws: Explained in 60 Seconds


Antitrust laws ensure competition thrives, providing consumers with lower prices and higher-quality products and services. However, some seek to rewrite these laws and undermine consumer power in the marketplace. Before Congress starts making unnecessary and harmful changes, it’s important to set a few things straight.

Learn More

Sign Up

Sign up to receive the latest news, resources, and event updates related to antitrust.

Latest Content

  • 2. By rule or statute, non-compete agreements should be made presumptively unlawful;
  • The Utah Statement
  • U.S. Chamber Calls Antitrust Report a Deeply Flawed Basis for Any Legislative Conversation
  • U.S. Chamber Strongly Believes Consumers Need to Remain at the Heart of Antitrust Laws
  • U.S. Chamber Comments Regarding Non-Compete Clauses Used in Employment Contracts
  • Five Things European Antitrust Gets Wrong
    Five Things European Antitrust Gets Wrong
  • A Closer Look at the EU’s $2.7 Billion Swipe at Google
    A Closer Look at the EU’s $2.7 Billion Swipe at Google
  • Adherence to ICN Guidance on Investigative Process: A Practitioner Survey