Antitrust
The Chamber advocates for antitrust laws that benefit all consumers and businesses and do not target specific companies or industries.
Latest
Featured story
With the trial phase of the United States v. Google case complete, the court must now focus on determining a remedy that addresses specific unfair practices without stifling competition.
Our Work
Antitrust laws ensure competition in free and open markets, which is the foundation of any vibrant, diverse, and dynamic economy. Healthy market competition benefits consumers through lower prices, higher quality products and services, more choices, and greater innovation.
Events
- Small BusinessFuture Proofing Your Business Tech for 2025 and BeyondThursday, September 1912:00 PM EDT - 12:30 PM EDTVirtualLearn More
- Climate ChangeThe Economic Benefits of Investing in Climate ResilienceThursday, September 2601:00 PM EDT - 02:00 PM EDTVirtualLearn More
- Small BusinessCO—100 Small Business Forum and AwardsTuesday, October 0812:00 PM EDT - 09:00 PM EDTVirtualLearn More
Latest Content
With the trial phase of the United States v. Google case complete, the court must now focus on determining a remedy that addresses specific unfair practices without stifling competition.
The U.S. Chamber issued the following statement on the Biden Administration's "Time is Money" initiative.
Duty to deal policies challenge conventional wisdom around free market dynamics and open a Pandora’s box of liability.
The U.S. Chamber was joined by 230 national assocations and state and local chambers in a letter to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) requesting it stay the effective date of the Noncompete Rule to allow for judicial review.
How the Neo-Brandeisian agenda at the American Economic Liberties Project’s Anti-Monopoly Summit undermines U.S. economic vitality and competitiveness.
U.S. Chamber statement on the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) final vote to ban employer noncompete agreements and litigation response.
The FTC's recent move to prevent the proposed merger between two large grocery chains, Kroger and Albertsons, relies on unsound legal theories that would jeopardize American free enterprise.
The FTC should evaluate mergers based on the effects on competition — and not with a politically motivated agenda.
The U.S. Chamber submitted a letter to the Financial Times' Rana Foroohar in advance of her conversation with FTC Chair Lina Khan at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace event, “The Future of American Innovation.”
