Antitrust
The Chamber advocates for antitrust laws that benefit all consumers and businesses and do not target specific companies or industries.
New report
U.S. legislative proposals could undermine U.S. economic and security interests and strengthen foreign rivals without any apparent benefit to U.S. consumers.
Feature story
The Chamber is proposing simple, yet effective, changes to the FTC's recusal process to ensure due process and transparency.
Our Work
Antitrust laws ensure competition in free and open markets, which is the foundation of any vibrant, diverse, and dynamic economy. Healthy market competition benefits consumers through lower prices, higher quality products and services, more choices, and greater innovation.
Events
- Small BusinessReady. Set. Scale.: How Small Business Can Leverage AIThursday, March 2812:00 PM EDT - 12:30 PM EDTLearn More
- InternationalTransatlantic Business Works Summit 2024Tuesday, April 2308:30 AM EDT - 01:30 PM EDTLearn More
- Security and Resilience13th Annual Building Resilience ConferenceWednesday, May 15 - Friday, May 1708:00 AM EDT - 03:00 PM EDTLearn More
Latest Content
The FTC should evaluate mergers based on the effects on competition — and not with a politically motivated agenda.
The U.S. Chamber submitted a letter to the Financial Times' Rana Foroohar in advance of her conversation with FTC Chair Lina Khan at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace event, “The Future of American Innovation.”
A government shutdown is the latest means by which the FTC plans to assert its politically motivated agenda against lawful, pro-competitive merger activity.
With economic uncertainty and international competition, now is not the time for political interference from states that would jeopardize American free enterprise.
The year ahead is shaping up to be eventful—complete with new faces, major court decisions, and lots of regulations—in the competition and consumer protection space.
The Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission revised final merger guidelines seek to rewrite decades of antitrust policy by declaring structural presumptions against mergers that increase market concentration and by downplaying the possibility of merger efficiencies.
This Coalition letter was sent to the Members of the House and Senate Committees on the Judiciary, on the FTC and DOJ's proposed changes to the premerger notification rules which would reject long-standing Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act standards.
This timeline shows the ways in which Chairwoman Khan has moved to silence dissent at the FTC and consolidated power in ways that call into question the independence of the agency.
The Department of Transportation Joins the Administration’s Effort to Stifle Merger Activity